Who

Kate Middleton's Photoshop Pregnancy

September 21, 2012, 10:15 am WHO Magazine whomagazine

Duchess Of Cambridge photoshopped to appear pregnant on US magazine cover

Kate Middleton Photoshop Pregnancy
Latest News
Rating:
(5)

Star Magazine/Getty Images

Is the Duchess Of Cambridge pregnant (“It’s Twins!”) or did Star magazine use Photoshop to make Kate Middleton look like she’s sporting a baby bump?

After claiming "It's Official -- Kate's Pregnant!" on the cover of it's September 17th issue, '"Star'' Magazine's new October 1 issue can reportedly now "confirm" that "It's Twins!" Using a photo of the Duchess - wearing a Prabal Gurung dress and holding a glass of water - from the state dinner in Singapore on September 11, the magazine shows The Duchess Of Cambridge with her hand on seemingly bumped-up belly. Moreover, a family friend reportedly confirms Middleton had an early pregnancy test done and her hormone levels indicated that two royal babies were on the way.

Getty Images

Gossip site, Celebuzz was first to report on Middleton's apparent photoshop. "When put side by side with the original, untouched image of Middleton, distinct differences materialize. Not only has is her floral slim-fit frock been mysteriously blown out - Photoshopped in magazine parlance - but Prince William's wife is mysteriously missing her right-hand ring on Star's "It's Twins!" cover," the website states.

PHOTOS: The Duchess Of Cambridge's Stylish Asia Tour!

When comparing Star's cover photo with the original, The Huffington Post echoed similar discrepancies:

"Star flipped the wire photo horizontally, which is standard publishing practice, and they've also lightened the Duchess' hair and face. But in our opinion, the retouching seems to go further. The lines of Catherine's dress appeared fuzzy on Star's cover, a sure sign that they've been manipulated (i.e., pressed outward to suggest a bump, perhaps?). They also seem to have removed a ring from her right hand and re-adjusted the water glass so it could be closer to her face. The placement of the "William's Warning!" graphic, which covers her backside, also makes her slim figure look wider than it is."

It's not the first time the Duchess of Cambridge has been photoshopped on the cover of a magazine. in August, Middleton appeared on the cover of Marie Claire South Africa.

RELATED: Prince William, Kate Middleton Win French Ruling Barring Publication Of Duchess Of Cambridge's Topless Photo

RELATED: Topless Photos Of Kate Middleton Anger Royals

Show:
Newest First
Oldest First
Top Rated
Most Replies

30 Comments

  1. lex07:33pm Friday 21st September 2012 ESTReport Abuse

    this is what a.holes do... get them selves into trouble i think what ever privacy photos and rumour photos and stories they say about the royals should be taken to court. how would the family of the photographers feel if some one done that to them or a member of their family... its a disgrace....

    Reply
  2. Andrea06:22pm Friday 21st September 2012 ESTReport Abuse

    If they keep publishing it often enough they are bound to get it right one day. Talk about putting the pressure on those two! Poor Kate. Everytime she has a bloated belly, which happens sometimes, the headlines go nuts over it.

    Reply
  3. Brad05:59pm Friday 21st September 2012 ESTReport Abuse

    who cares if Will blew a big gooey load in her #$%$ im sure they do fu

    2 Replies
  4. Mathu05:52pm Friday 21st September 2012 ESTReport Abuse

    Just ignore; this is what the greedy photographers and publishers do to make quick money by raising the anxieties of royal fans and the resultant rise in the sales of newspapers and magazines.

    Reply
  5. wanderer05:39pm Friday 21st September 2012 ESTReport Abuse

    revolution to remove all royals from the world and all dictators too .... and religious zealots and corrupt officials and mafiosa style people

    Reply
  6. DOLLARS05:32pm Friday 21st September 2012 ESTReport Abuse

    Save the topless photos for when she is pregnant , at least then we will be able to see the total breast age. Bcos theres not much to look at folks (if you know what i mean)

    Reply
  7. Sawsan05:15pm Friday 21st September 2012 ESTReport Abuse

    Come on, maybe she was bloated at that time. How manytimes they posted such news!!! boringgggggggggggggg.

    Reply
  8. Peter04:56pm Friday 21st September 2012 ESTReport Abuse

    The way media carries on ... a good headline would be to fake her funeral too! What bloody bovine excreta these magazines produce. The people who buy this shyte are no better. Can't they see themselves being hoodwinked? Do not buy the mags for one or two editions and they will fold. Come on people just try that.

    Reply
  9. Dean04:55pm Friday 21st September 2012 ESTReport Abuse

    Why do these idiots bring themselves down to such low levels and do this type of thing. To sell their trash mags? Bloody fools, they should be sued out of business if they blatantly sell lies. Put them to good use and force them into politics, they would fit right in...

    Reply
  10. waffelon04:55pm Friday 21st September 2012 ESTReport Abuse

    Well if you really look at the photos there is a whole lot of things that standout like the proverbial dogs ***** the bracelet is on the wrong arm being the most clear thing that is wrong. Compare the Getty image with the one by Star Magazine.

    Reply

Most-Read Stories