Work Life Balance Amongst Cultures: Where does Australia Stand?
Posted by Sacha Crouch for Health + Wellbeing - Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:13
Work-life balance is a buzz phrase today, mostly because of the many studies affirming its relationship to employee satisfaction and productivity. Still, cynics brand work-life balance as simply a by-product of the fast activity within Western industrialized nations --- something the Chinese businessman who does Tai Chi every morning doesn’t really care about.
Call me a bit of a nerd, but I thought it might be interesting to explore exactly what the differences are in relation to work life balance amongst different cultures in the world.
A study conducted by IBM affirmed that work-life balance is a need among their employees across the globe. Regardless of location, IBM employees report “significant work-life responsibilities,†including care for dependents and elders. Furthermore, nationality doesn’t necessarily translate to differences in the expressed desire for work-life balance. Could Australia’s situation, where 1 out of 5 employees work more than 48 hours a week --- and three-fourths of this number would gladly give up higher pay for more personal time --- actually be the norm?
Is your company culture killing you?
How differently do we approach work-life balance compared to the rest of the world? Below are three cultural factors to think about:
Individualism vs. Collectivism
Australia ranks as one of the highly individualized countries in the world, second only to the United States. In individualist states, people tend seek and protect personal interests over common goals. Collectivist states are the opposite; people in collectivist states tend to prioritize common goals over individual needs.
On the whole, it seems that most companies in individualist societies leave the choice of pursuing work-life balance to individual employees --- considering it a value to not impinge on the freedom to choose health, happiness and family time over higher pay and faster ascent up the corporate ladder. Well and good; this freedom is actually credited as one of the reasons why individualized countries are more prosperous. Unfortunately though, it tends to create a system of appraising performance based on time spent in the workplace.
Employees have the liberty to choose family time or overtime bonus, true, but those who choose the latter will be viewed with higher regard by the company. An Australian manager, for example, would be more prone to promote individual employees who produce more, while a manager from, say, collectivist Colombia would provide raises for everyone when the over-all company profit has increased. With statistics indicating that Australian companies are not providing enough leeway for work-life balance, sometimes the only resort seems to be to defy company culture to pursue work-life balance.
Related links:Of course, this doesn’t necessarily mean collectivist cultures have it better. In collectivist countries, work-life balance seems mostly dependent on the goodwill of corporate management and government legislators. Those in collectivist countries are highly conscious of the demands of the corporation; they will always work within prescribed office hours --- or find passive-aggressive ways of getting more personal time! It’s an ideal set-up if authorities are supportive of work-life balance initiatives, such as Singapore which has legislated initiatives friendly to mothers in the workplace. But when a company in a collectivist country is not pro work-life balance, or when governance is weak as is the case in most third world nations, even a culture that values family time needs to make sacrifices.
Work Attitude
Another characteristic of culture worth exploring is the general attitude towards performance. You have achievement-oriented countries (what sociologist Hofstede calls masculine cultures) which are driven by competition, ambition and aggressive pursuit of goals. And you have feminine cultures which emphasize over-all quality of life over professional success.
Denmark, one of the most feminine of cultures in the world, boasts having a work-life balance friendly culture. Denmark, a country where 87% of children under 5 years old have day care provision, has a high percentage of women in the workforce. Danish legislation also allows parental leave for both mothers and fathers to encourage parental bonding with an infant. The Danes tend to go home exactly when the working day is over, and three quarters of the workforce work strictly 5 days a week.
Germany, on the other hand, has a masculine culture. Almost half of qualified women in the workplace opt to remain childless, as kids are perceived as anti-careers. There’s also hesitation among working women to take time off work to raise a family, as they may lose the career perks they’ve worked hard for if they take time off. Women that do work have anxieties because of the cultural perception that working mothers are not good parents.
Australians have an interesting culture that plays ping-pong between masculine and feminine cultural traits. On the surface, we may be mistaken for not being achievement-oriented, as we generally have a relaxed disposition and a tendency to downplay success. But ambition and goal-pursuit are highly valued, and sticking to business agendas appreciated. We are a mixed up bunch aren’t we—perhaps this is why we struggle so much with prioritising!
Time Orientation
The perception and valuing of time also differs from culture to culture, and it can affect conceptions of what may be considered as work-life balance. In Scandinavia, for example, there’s a tendency to view the separation of work and personal time as sacred, and business lunches are strictly about business --- you party when you get home. In Nepal, on the other hand, there’s little thought to closing a business during office hours to have a meal with a friend.
In Australia, I dare say that our boundaries are very blurred but in the opposite way. We have no problem keeping business time, business but we find it very difficult to keep our personal time, personal. Our work lives are often allowed to flow freely into our personal lives.
One culture may hastily judge another as not valuing work-life balance, when it’s a simple matter of strict versus permeable boundaries between personal and professional lives.
Related links:
What have your experiences been in relation to the differences in work life balance in different cultures?
Author of De-stress Your Success: Get More of What You Want with Less Time, Stress and Effort, Sacha Crouch is a business, executive and life coach who helps people create the work and lives they love. For other free lifestyle resources visit www.activ8change.com.au and www.de-stressyoursuccess.com

22 Comments
That's CAPITALISM for you. Exploiting people to the MAX in every possible way. You have no LIFE! No HOPE! How do you get LIFE? Individualism is bad for lot of us but collectivism is the way to LIVE happily together and achieve anything we desire for the good of the TRIBE and the individual sheep. People still don't get it that working for a capitalist for a misserable wage is a new improved form of paid slavery. They make sure that after you paid your dues nothing left to enjoy the leftover life. God help us all!
1 Replyautralians wouldnt know a hard days work if they fell over it, they stop all the time. 3 weeks to get mail, and thats inside the country as well as outside. you do everything inyour own tim, and you want the rest of the world to follow suit, but you cant run anything like that, and never will.
ReplyTo a certain degree I agree with Todds way of thinking. However rent is going up, we're being taxed for the use of water, house prices are going up, kids education, electricity. My dad is the hardest working man I know. All through out my life he was never there for me. He was also absent from my birth. But now I've grown up I realised he was trying to provide a good life for us which we have now. If we're being over worked we have no choice if we want to keep living.
ReplyWe get sucked in by all the advertising and keep buying, all people seem to do is work long hours to buy things they dont realy need anyway, are they realy happy which is the main aim in life ,surely
ReplyWorked 7 day/wk = 90 hrs/wk for 10 years with 1 sick day and 1 weekend off in the first 5 years averaged 3 hrs sleep per night. A double income family 2 children and taxed to the Max. Gov & Employers loved it & they take your soul. The harder you try the more they suck out of you. Make your own terms and live, you don’t get time with family back. Kids have left home and I am taxed even more as a single wage earner...go figure!
Replyi average between 48 and 64 hours a week with 2 hrs a day driving to and from work 6 days in my presant job prior to that i was working 12 days on 2 days off 13 to 14 hr a days as a supervisor/manager your expected to be there when the place is open with lots of unrealistic target that need to be met
ReplyLike Christina M, I worked in HR for a large company for over 10 years. They viewed themselves as being progressive and touted policies such as 'Work-Life Balance', being 'Family Friendly', etc. None of this reflected reality. It came down to impossible expectations of a full time job, their pleading poverty (a lie!) ergo 'Time In Lieu' rather than overtime. I worked 24/7 & logged over 6 months of TIL which I could never take until I had a physical breakdown.
ReplyOver worked over stressed and over taxed. I wonder if the carbon tax applies to politicians- they seem to be blowing a lot of hot air all by themselves.
Replyshould raise retirement age to 85 too............
ReplyYour comparisons of collectivist vs individualist cultures is interesting. I work in HR and would like to see more emphasis put on productivity rather than hours. I'm currently seeking a flexible working arrangement at work and as you said, it does feel like I am 'defying company culture' in this oddly selfish pursuit to spend more time with my child.
Reply