Our Experts

Cholesterol & Heart Disease
Your Healthy Heart

Assessing Your Heart Attack and Stroke Risk

Sep 08 06:26am

Are there accurate ways to predict the likelihood that you will have, or die from, a heart attack or stroke in the near future?

Quite a few "biomarkers," or predictors, of these dire events have been discovered. But how helpful are these tests? You shouldn't have to pay for tests you may not really need.

Researchers examined 10 of these biomarkers in more than 3,000 participants in the long-term Framingham Heart Study to see which ones were most useful. The following five were found to do the best job of predicting the risk of death from heart attack or stroke during 7.4 years of follow-up.

  • C-reactive protein (CRP). Surprisingly, the blood test for C-reactive protein (CRP) predicts the risk of death, but not of cardiovascular events.
  • Homocysteine. Homocysteine is an amino acid produced in the body in higher amounts when levels of the vitamin folic acid are low.
  • B-type natriuretic peptide. This peptide is one of the most effective individual markers to predict both the risk of cardiovascular events and death.
  • Renin. An enzyme produced and released by the kidneys into the bloodstream to regulate blood pressure.
  • Urine test measuring the ratio of albumin to creatinine. Like the B-type natriuretic peptide, this marker predicts both the risk of cardiovascular events and of death.

Five other blood biomarkers tested in the study were less useful:

  • Fibrinogen. A protein converted to fibrin to form a major component of blood clots.
  • Plasminogen-activator inhibitor. This substance hinders the body's ability to produce plasmin, an enzyme that helps to eliminate blood clots. Thus, it interferes with the removal of blood clots formed in arteries. 
  • D-dimer. A breakdown product of fibrin, D-dimer is a marker of blood-clot formation that can predict the likelihood of a heart attack.
  • Aldosterone. A hormone secreted by the adrenal cortex that raises blood pressure by increasing sodium retention by the kidney.
  • N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide. This peptide is released from the atria of the heart in response to increased blood pressure. It is a predictor of total and cardiac death in survivors of a previous heart attack.

As you might expect, the Framingham analysis found that people who had high levels of multiple markers were at a significantly greater risk of heart attack and stroke, and especially a greater risk of death. Here are some points to remember about even the more sensitive of these newer biomarkers:

  • Testing for them added only a little to the information already provided by the standard tests currently used to assess the risk of cardiovascular events (high LDL cholesterol, high blood pressure, cigarette smoking, low HDL cholesterol, diabetes, family history, and age).
  • These markers should be used only, if at all, in those people found to be at "intermediate risk," based on the standard risk factors. (But since most Americans fall into the intermediate-risk category, my guess is that certain of these newer tests will continue to be widely used.)

If you have been told to obtain one or more of these biomarker tests, ask your doctor why. And also, before you ask your doctor for a biomarker test that you heard about from a friend or newspaper story, always first ask whether your level of risk warrants getting it.

14 Comments Report Abuse
11. baliglobalmarket - Aug 13 01:18pm
My sister in law has got stroke four month ago and she can not taste all of food that she eat. Do you have any suggestion to recovery this condition. http://www.baliglobalmarket.com
12. paulmargaret@sbcglobal.net - Nov 18 10:31am
No. 1 above is gobbeldeguk. Shame on you.
13. bigbrowneyes4659@sbcglobal.net - May 14 09:23am
why don't employers like to hire people with heart problems? I have filed out many applications. And once they hear that I have had open-heart surgery. With a pacemaker. They say I might be a liability to them or their company. And they won't give me a job. WHY IS THIS?
14. brate.smith - Sep 15 08:13pm
In the cases of heart attack and cardiac arrest, or any other heart shocks, time sets to be the most crucial factor for the survival of the patient. Sometimes, a little knowledge regarding the immediate actions to be taken may help your near and dear ones to survive in such incidents. The response a person takes to treat a victim decides the probability of his/her survival. Its been my personal experience fighting to survive against a heart attack. A quick reorganization of your bodily responses may increase your chances of survival. Because of having many heart problems, I was enrolled in a concierge Healthcare program from elite health. I was attacked by a severe heart attack in a party, luckily surrounded by many people. Some of the sudden changes in my body was recognized by me and anticipated immediately. I got a very severe chest pain which was almost unbearable for more than a minute. I got the suspicion that I might be having heart attack, and immediately called my physician on the phone, and explained my condition and its severity. Because of the immediate guidance, I was directed immediately to have an aspirin which I used to carry with me as prescribed by my physician. It was quite a frightening experience for me to face such a heart attack, but somehow I managed to be calm until 911 arrived. I was immediately taken to the nearest hospital, where already my physician were present and have got everything setup according to my medical history. And it was in some matter of seconds that everything was in control. A doctor, who already have the complete knowledge of the medical history and fitness of the person, extra ordinarily ameliorate your recovery process. Hence such a concierge level program from Elite health, helped me a save my life, like many others.
Leave your comments You must sign in to leave a comment
Yahoo!7 Answers

Health Questions with Yahoo!7 Answers